|
Individual differences in cognIve tasks – do they mean what we think they mean?| old_uid | 12682 |
|---|
| title | Individual differences in cognIve tasks – do they mean what we think they mean? |
|---|
| start_date | 2013/06/27 |
|---|
| schedule | 11h |
|---|
| online | no |
|---|
| location_info | Bât 452, RdC, Bibliotheque de l'équipe |
|---|
| details | Conférence CRNL-DYCOG "Dynamique cérébrale et cognition" |
|---|
| summary | With resurgent interest in individual differences in perception, cognition and behavioural control, as early indicators of disease, endophenotypes, or a means to relate brain structure to function, behavioural tasks are increasingly being transferred from within-subject settings to between-group or correlational designs. The assumption is that where we know the mechanisms underlying within-subject effects, these effects can be used to measure individual differences in those same mechanisms. However, between-subject variability can arise from an entirely different source from that driving within-subject effects, and here we report a clear-cut demonstration of this, using the example of masked priming. |
|---|
| responsibles | Béranger, Rossetti |
|---|
| |
|