|
Knowledge, Justification and Reason-Based Belief" (joint work with B. Renne and P. Marty)| old_uid | 14701 |
|---|
| title | Knowledge, Justification and Reason-Based Belief" (joint work with B. Renne and P. Marty) |
|---|
| start_date | 2014/11/26 |
|---|
| schedule | 14h-16h |
|---|
| online | no |
|---|
| location_info | RdC |
|---|
| summary | Can knowledge be defined as justified true belief? I will present elements from a recent joint paper with Bryan Renne and Paul Marty in which we argue that the answer can legitimately be positive or negative depending on how the concept of justification is articulated. Gettier's counterexamples to the JTB analysis typically challenge internal justifications. Our main argument is that we can give an alternative version of the JTB analysis in which the concept of justification is understood is more externalist terms. To achieve this goal, we argue for the need to represent reasons in epistemic logic, and for the need to distinguish between adequate reasons and veridical reasons. The distinction also allows us to make progress on the typology of Gettier cases. |
|---|
| responsibles | Proust, Égré |
|---|
| |
|