|
Metacognition and Intuition in a Denominator Neglect Task: Converging Evidence from Individual Differences and Gaze Tracking Analyses| old_uid | 15444 |
|---|
| title | Metacognition and Intuition in a Denominator Neglect Task: Converging Evidence from Individual Differences and Gaze Tracking Analyses |
|---|
| start_date | 2015/04/02 |
|---|
| schedule | 10h30-12h |
|---|
| online | no |
|---|
| summary | It is a well-established finding that people with high IQ and who are motivated to think analytically perform better on a variety of reasoning tasks than their less able and less motivated counterparts. The usual interpretation of this relationship is that the former group have the capacity and motivation to inhibit appealing intuitive answers and engage the necessary resources to derive a correct one. In this talk, I will present some counter-intuitive evidence to suggest that high-IQ people are more accurate, even when they must respond under time pressure, suggesting that their intuitions, as well as their deliberations, are better than low-IQ reasoners. I will also provide an analysis of gaze patterns that help to elucidate strategies that lead to accurate and confident responses. |
|---|
| responsibles | Pélissier |
|---|
| |
|